I’ve been playing around with warmtone papers and selenium toning. I started out with Ilford Art 300 but then got interested in the “normal” papers, since the eggshell texture of Art 300 doesn’t work great on scenes that feature lots of fine detail.

I decided to do a little comparison of the Ilford Warmtone (MGWT) line and the Foma Fomatone line. I printed the same scene on each paper twice, doing my best to match exposure and contrast, and then toned one copy of each paper for a total of 4 prints.

Tested papers
The papers I tested. Both matte fiber-based.

The enlargement setup I used was:

I was quite surprised by the results. TL;DR, Fomatone paper takes tone much, much more intensely than Ilford MGWT. And I think I prefer its look, even when untoned.

Cutting to the chase

4 Warmtone prints
Clockwise from top left: Fomatone untoned, Fomatone toned, MGWT toned, MGWT untoned.

Fomatone took toning extremely intensely. In the toned Ilford MGWT print you can hardly see the effect of the selenium, but the color shift in the Foma paper is very dramatic. These were toned at the same time, in the same tray. I would estimate that after about 1 minute of toning, the Fomatone was already at the level of the MGWT after 5 minutes.

My experience with Art 300 is that it tones somewhere in between. More shift than MGWT, but much less than Fomatone.

A couple other things I noticed as a first-time user of these papers:

All in all, I think I actually prefer the Fomatone look. It is a little challenging being so contrasty though, since with my condenser setup most of my prints are already at lower filter grades. Might be a situation where I keep both on hand.